• admiralteal
    link
    fedilink
    81 year ago

    If the data were properly encrypted and could only be decrypted by the client on their own device

    Yeah, but part of Wyze’s sales pitch is their AI image recognition features, and they’d lose all training data by doing that and would force it to be processed locally, both of which would be a dead end.

    I realize these might not be features you want nor care about… but those are the features they want to offer.

    • @FigMcLargeHuge@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      51 year ago

      If I would have said 30 years ago that people in the future would pay money for a device that lets companies basically spy on you, and then they can also sell the data, I would have been branded a lunatic and sent for psychiatric help. Yet, here we are.

      • admiralteal
        link
        fedilink
        51 year ago

        You’re talking about a device which is a full-color high-definition surveillance camera that works at night and can be viewed from literally anywhere in the world and can be configured to send you alerts based on seeing people/animals/packages/whatever. That only costs them an inflation adjusted $13.

        I don’t really think the “they wouldn’t believe this shit” argument really applies with how rapidly tech has changed.