• @dumpsterlid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    251 year ago

    Gotta be honest, rockpapershotgun’s coverage of this game hasn’t gotten me very interested in this being anything other than a hyped flash in the pan but we’ll see

    • @Ashtear@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      61 year ago

      Katharine’s review today steps back from that flash-in-the-pan take (and it wasn’t a good one).

      No doubt there’s some empty calories here, though.

      • @dumpsterlid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        51 year ago

        Idk I guess I still didn’t get the vibe it was anywhere as special as the hype train is treating it. It honestly feels weirdly artificial for a hype train too.

        • @CaptainEffort@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          101 year ago

          This feels like a weird take if you haven’t even played it. Like, how would you know?

          The game is flawed, but genuinely super fun, and has a ton going for it outside of “Pokemon with guns”. In a lot of ways it’s what I always wished Pokemon could be, at least in the ways it makes its monsters feel unique and like actual partners instead of battle slaves, which is ironic considering Palworld is the one with actual slavery.

        • @TwilightVulpine@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          101 year ago

          I doubt a no name company would be pulling all this attention out of marketing alone. If it was this easy everyone would do it.

          In all fairness, this is not a great game. It’s a very derivative game whose only appeal is that it combines things in a way that hasn’t been done much. Like many other hype trains of questionable quality, it just happened to scratch the right itch for the right people at the right time.

          • 🐑🇸 🇭 🇪 🇪 🇵 🇱 🇪🐑
            link
            fedilink
            English
            3
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Kind of how Fortnite was a rehash of stolen ideas (originally) of PUBG

            The reason people originally hated Fortnite was because not only did they blatantly plagiarise PUBG, Sony also intentionally screwed over PUBG to make Fortnite more popular

            • @Zo0@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              21 year ago

              I haven’t heard of the Sony-PUBG shenannigans, would you care to tell me more about it?

        • @Ashtear@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          71 year ago

          You’re getting downvoted, but I think there’s something to this, even if it’s not the whole story. The game had a robust presence unnaturally quickly on Tiktok and among streamers. This studio isn’t big enough to have engineered a big campaign, but it’s quite possible they did some small, targeted marketing and it really paid off.

          • @dumpsterlid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            51 year ago

            Yeah but also I think the nature of viral content is just spinning out into chaos with the amount of AI generated content and bots. I am sure palworld deserves its popularity to an extent but it’s the velocity and utter completeness of palworld’s popularity that feels weird. At some level I think algorithms are heavily distorting cultural phenomena like this to be much more “winner takes all” in terms of popularity. It is not only how humans tend to act but it is also the most profitable way to monetize culture.

          • @wolfshadowheart@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            21 year ago

            I’ve been seeing people mention “the game has been in development for 2 years” and all these trailers and stuff but… I didn’t hear a thing until the game released, it exploded and now it’s all I’m seeing.

        • @Tattorack@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          The studio doesn’t make games for the good ideas, but to make money. Shocker, I know. But get this; the developers are paying for this parser that determines what kind of product will sell well, based on social media.

          The developers have admitted to using something like that to decide what kind of games they’ll make.

    • @johannesvanderwhales@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      41 year ago

      It’s surprisingly entertaining, but you might want to wait until it leaves early access if you’re on the fence. It’s very buggy and there’s big aspects of the game that aren’t filled out yet.