I am a software engineer living and working in Belgrade, Serbia. My hobbies contain a lot of things including cycling, bikepacking, photography. My political view are closer to left-wing anarchism.

All the photos are made by myself (if not specified other) and are shared under CC-BY 4.0.

  • 6 Posts
  • 64 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: April 27th, 2023

help-circle
  • Sem@lemmy.mltoMemes@lemmy.mlIt's just a question
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    6 days ago

    How can you prove to conspiracy theorist that he is wrong while conspiracy theory does not fulfill the falsifiability criteria by definition? Like everything that can proove that the conspiracy theorist is wrong just marked as CIA propaganda / Masonic manipulation / Government is hiding / whatever? I mean if the theory accepts only facts that proove it and rejects any facts that do not, this “theory” cannot make mistakes by definition, can it?



  • I read the whole article and did not find an answer for a very simple question: what are benefits for users? The whole speech is about how we CAN put agents to all the devices, etc. without answering the simple question WHY should we do it. There are a lot of words about how can google and friends use the data for advertising. But nothing about motivation of users to allow it. He is talking about economical reasons but it will work if and only if users will have economical reasons to put agents on their devices. As of today I do not see a lot of usage of autonomous agents outside of the professional work like software development or ms word automation. What are reasons for people to make these agents a part of their life? The whole speech is built on top of the assumption that happens without a word about why should it. Am I missing something?







  • I agreed about media. The story is much more complex as usual, there was good and there was bad about USSR. I do not like the idea of taking only good or only bad about USSR from the history to aggressively and manipulatively push somthing.

    And I do not like when anyone’s family past is used for politival advantage or disadvantage. Like why is it matter where who was born, who was one’s grandpa or something, etc. when we are talking on current days politics? Focus on the present problem.


  • I only left this commentary because for me making a meme with mentioning only her father is kind of manipulation. There is the fact that her family (mother) was oppressed. Technically speaking she doesn’t lie when she is is saying that. The “meme” is trying to portrait it like she is lying by providing only half of information and by ignoring another half. I just do not like it. And it is not against what did you say.



  • Sem@lemmy.mltoMemes@lemmy.mlVictims of Communism
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    During the March 1949 Soviet mass deportations, Kallas’ mother, Kristi, six months old at the time, grandmother and great-grandmother, all labeled as “enemies of the state”, were deported to Siberia. Her mother was allowed to return to Soviet-occupied Estonia in 1959.

    I think she was talking about her mother as victim of USSR, not about his father.







  • Sem@lemmy.mltoPrivacy@lemmy.ml*Permanently Deleted*
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yes. For me reasons of VPN on Android (even with Google) are following:

    1. Most of greedy apps are trying to collect info about your location. Because in most of the cases you will restrict direct access to the location data, apps will try to do it through IP. VPN resolve this problem at all.
    2. A lot of greedy apps or websites are trying to do fingerprinting to identity your logs. While it is possible in theory to do fingerprinting by fuzzy matching all-logs against all-logs, the task is so computationally heavy that the only way is to try to do fuzzy-matching (aka fingerprinting) within the locations. VPN allows you to hide your location.

    Of course one may say that VPN does not provide a 100% protections from fingerprinting, I think there should be applied the same approach like in cyber security: the goal is not to protect yourself by 100% but to make attack so expensive that it does not make sense. VPN makes fingerprinting so hard that noone will really do it until you are a journalist, intelligence officer or something like this.




  • Sem@lemmy.mltoMemes@lemmy.mlCouldn't have happened to a nicer guy
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    28
    ·
    1 year ago

    Deepseek collects and process all the data you sent to their LLN even from API calls. It is a no-go for most of businesses applications. For example, OpenAI and Anyhropic do not collect or process anyhow data sent via API and there is an opy-ouy button in their settings that allows to avoid processing of the data sent via UI.