It’s ok they will use their AI to wargame and it will fumble the bag as it can only extrapolate based on previous data and not account for people being pissed.
I’m sorry Mark it I was completely wrong to say they wouldn’t reach for the guillotines, I can remember that in future scenarios. Let me know what you want to do next?
Nobody thinks he’s a good guy, but unless you have something wrong with you killing someone is hard, especially if they are defenseless.
They’re better predictors of what people think will happen.
They’re better predictors of what people that use them think will happen
I mean someone did test it.
He should get used to being in the hit seat, he’s going to be in a very hot one for a long time soon.
This is exactly how capitalism functions, it’s happening under capitalism.
JFC weren’t a trash article.
Sounds like the DoE developed a way to extract uranium from sea water using some sort of polymer, and they are taking tech funding to “commercialize” it
This is dumb, I have to use osX for work and having coreutils be similar but not quite the same is a PITA, why would you inflict this on yourself to close a class of bugs that aren’t really a huge concern for coreutils.
The only real dangers of AI:
All the “it’s nearly AGI” stuff is just marketing
Or just put useable guardrails on it.
I have to use Claude for work, if they were actually worried about safety it would be far easier to control the permissions of processes instead they basically let you filter strings that it executed in a subshell.
Modern computing systems can be pretty fine grained around network and systemcall access (including inheritance to prevent escapes), none of these tools do that, because this is just marketing not real fear.
Underfunding of regulatory departments and rubber-stamping is also common in Europe, it was a major factor in the Grenfell fire
What tools have you found difficult to use?
I think the main issue is that it takes a lot of RAM to edit videos or everything slows to a halt, but as long as I’ve had enough ram KdenLive & openshot have worked fine IIRC
They aren’t rogue, they are just unsupervised, openAI know exactly what they are doing and it’s all about the headlines.
No I’m pointing out that the n900 with it’s full keyboard was not modeled of the iPhone.
The n900 was an interation in the n800, but sure how that can be modeled on the iPhone without time travel.
Is the iPhones invocation patenting things?
capacitive touch screen
The first phone with a capacitive touch screen was the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LG_Prada the iPhone was built with the technology that was around at the time.
People credit the iPhone with creating smartphones but much like Tesla’s the tech was ready and they launched at the right time. I guess Apple patented multitouch slowing down adoption of multitouch on laptops by decades, but I’d credit Apple with that not Jobs.
Ok and none of them were innovative.
What was the innovation in the iPhone?
It was worse in almost every way except marketing than the n900.
The technology had reached the point where you could have smartphones by then, I don’t see what was innovative about iPhones.
You can call it visionary, sure because he spread his vision for a locked down phone, but where is the innovation in the iPhone?
Sure but why?
That’s the least important reason to not use AI. All property is theft, especially copyright!
There is a difference between people using AI to help write/maintain code that they understand, and slopcoding unmaintainable vibe projects.