• Victor
    link
    fedilink
    English
    76
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    [Drops flyers with warning message saying “we will attack soon; flee, those who can!”]

    [Attacks the refugee camps, oh and also hospitals]

    100% assholes. 👌 Equal to or worse than the Russians, I swear to freaking God.

    • prole
      link
      fedilink
      English
      71 year ago

      I don’t think I remember hearing about Russians bombing Ukrainian refugee camps (though I could have missed it).

      Seems like Putin sees civilians as an inconvenience that get in the way of his goals. For Netanyahu, it seems as though killing the civilians is the goal. I would say that the latter is objectively worse (though they are both pieces of shit).

        • @barsoap@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Not to mention eradicating close to the entirety of the military-aged male population in Donetsk and Luhansk by forced conscription.

          I might grant Putin though that he’s only doing a cultural genocide, that is, the attacks on civilian infrastructure have the actual military goal of breaking resistance – which is known to generally not work, hence why it’s a war crime. He’s perfectly fine with people staying alive as long as they bend the knee and become Russian.

          • @0000011110110111i@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 year ago

            the attacks on civilian infrastructure have the actual military goal of breaking resistance – which is known to generally not work, hence why it’s a war crime.

            I think it’d be a war crime even if it generally worked.

            • @barsoap@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -1
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              That’s the pacifist answer but no that’s not how war crimes work: The rules of war aren’t about avoiding bloodshed, they’re about avoiding pointless bloodshed, pointless from the point of winning an armed conflict, that is. If you can shorten a conflict and spare millions of lives by killing a couple thousands of civilians, well, a couple thousand is less than millions. War is erm dispassionate like that, a hard-nosed calculus.

              Hence why you also get rules like the ban on hollow-point bullets: They’re more likely to kill than to disable. Killing combatants, however, is less effective at binding up enemy resources and thus not a sound military strategy, using them means that you care more about killing people than winning the engagement. If, OTOH, the enemy started killing all their wounded soldiers instead of expending medical resources that reasoning would cease to apply and you’d be justified using hollow points. (Which are btw in ample use by police forces because they ricochet much less, leading to less injured bystanders, but you generally don’t have bystanders on the battlefield. Similarly tear gas is allowed for police use but outlawed for war because it could get confused with a nasty chemical attack very easily, possibly leading to a very nasty escalation when the attacked force responds in kind. Also for the record there’s plenty of legitimate uses of white phosphorous, tracer rounds and smoke screens all use it, the banned use is as an incendiary weapon anywhere close to civilians but that’s not special to white phosphorous, that’s a general thing about incendiary weapons).

      • @andxz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        91 year ago

        Russia is bombing no less indiscriminately than Israel, it’s just a much larger theater of war, their aiming capabilities suck and their shit gets shot down a lot before ever reaching anything.

        They do the exact same thing day in day out. Taking out a cluster of civilians is probably worth an extra ration of vodka or even worse, a promotion, at this point.

        Two wars of terror, if you want. Irony is stone cold dead at this point.

      • Victor
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        Putin sees civilians as an inconvenience that get in the way of his goals. For Netanyahu, it seems as though killing the civilians is the goal

        Yes exactly, that was basically my point, that Israel is actively attacking civilians almost exclusively (it feels like to me anyway).

      • @NobodyElse@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        291 year ago

        Even if that was the case, the IDF have no moral high ground when attacking the hospital. That just makes their job of killing Hamas harder. Hamas is an irregular force, a terrorist organization. They don’t follow the rules of war. But IDF is a regular army and should act like one lest we see them as a terrorist organization too.

        If a dangerous criminal is found milling about in a crowd of people, even if some of of the people are sympathetic to him, the police don’t get to just mow the crowd down to get to him.

        • @Mirshe@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          211 year ago

          Exactly this. Hamas forces are shit for using hospitals and schools as shields, I’ll grant that. But the IDF is a proper first-world military force, and should act the part. Dislodging an occupying force from a command center or strongpoint that also happens to be full of civilians shouldn’t involve bombing the place flat with civilians inside, especially when it’s clearly marked as a noncombatant area (like a hospital or a school). The US Air Force did that, with camera and audio footage that showed the crew knew they weren’t in the right, in Afghanistan (the Kunduz hospital airstrike, 2015), and were roundly vilified for it - why should we not hold Israel to the same standard?

          • Victor
            link
            fedilink
            English
            31 year ago

            Extremely based. Makes perfect sense; no sarcasm. Well phrased. ❤️

        • @Seventhlevin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -9
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Do you realize that a “regular army” would level the place entirely with airstrikes and artillery? --Because that’s what would be most expedient and cost the fewest Israeli lives and least money overall.

      • @BradleyUffner@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        9
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        This wasn’t a hospital. They don’t a get a pass to bomb a refugee camp today because Hamas fighters hid in a hospital last week.

        • @TserriednichThe4th@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -171 year ago

          Hamas should stop hiding in refugee camps too…

          Extend the logic, come on.

          It is well known hamas hides among civilians. That is the main reason there is so much civilian collateral damage. Hamas themselves said it is their strategy ffs.

          • @Snoozemumrik@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -11 year ago

            And Israeli officials (Netanyahu, Gvir, Smotrich, etc.) have stated that their goal is genocide. How do you feel about that?

            • @TserriednichThe4th@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              01 year ago

              No they havent lmao.

              The worse netanyahu has said is that he prefers a one state solution and that hamas existing is useful in polarizing people towards that solution. That doesnt mean genociding arab muslims, because there are plenty in israel.

              But no person in israel with any substantial support believes in genocide.

    • Cyborganism
      link
      fedilink
      English
      41 year ago

      Aw man. My original comment was removed for incivility. Apologies to the mods. Thanks for not banning me on the spot. That’s appreciated.

      Gotta say it’s difficult to remain civil in the face of a genocide.

      What my original comment said, without the incivility, was:

      I hope Israel and it’s military end up at the international court at the Hague and go to jail for crimes against humanity and that the world finally tells Israel to back off and go back to the borders that were drawn in the 1967 UN Security Council resolution.

        • Cyborganism
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          I wasn’t banned. My comment was deleted because I wasn’t very civil. Lots of f-bombs and stuff.

          I think it’s alright to try to encourage a more civil discussion where we can argue by challenging each other’s arguments without using profanity.

      • @Seventhlevin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        0
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        You are referring to the return of the “land for peace” idea from '67; but, Israel engaging in that peace process and returning said land (that was won by conquest during a defensive war in '48) merely resulted in the '69 war and '73 invasion. Since then, Arab leaders have completed a 180° about-face from their stated position of “no recognition, no peace, and no negotiations.” By beginning to normalize with Israel, they have also begun to remove the need for a “land for peace” process, in large part because of the land Israel has already given back.

        • Cyborganism
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -11 year ago

          Ok well I might have gotten confused over what was signed over which year.

          What I was basically trying to say is there was an agreement at some point over the land borders. I might have been the original ones or some other ones later. In any case Israel needs to revert what they’ve done and give the land back until they go back to that border that was agreed upon.

          Although, I doubt that even that will bring peace to the region after what they’ve done.

    • be_excellent_to_each_other
      link
      fedilink
      21 year ago

      fuck off and go back to the borders that were drawn in the 1967 UN Security Council resolution.

      Yeah I ran across this awhile ago posted by Björk, and have been wondering if it’s factual. Paints a bit of a different picture of the motivations of Palestinians in general if true:

      I’d be interested to see the 2023 version.

  • thecookingsenpai
    link
    fedilink
    English
    91 year ago

    A lot of comments are saying that hamas hides behind civilians but from what I see and read hamas and civilians are a melting pot that is interwined due to the extreme oppression in gaza strip. Any palestinian civilian could understand and help or even just not condemn totally hamas due to their conditions and prolly Israel gladly label as hamas any slightly suspect palestinian top

    • @RGB3x3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      101 year ago

      If you know that your enemy is hiding behind civilians and still kill the civilians, you’re the bad guy.

      It’s a piss poor excuse for murder.

      • @InformalTrifle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        So don’t retaliate? I think the Israeli response is over the top but should they never respond if their attackers fire from within civilian areas and don’t care at all about civilians on their own side?

      • thecookingsenpai
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        Yes is basically what i said in the last sentence. Sometimes u just can’t untie civilians and fighters, especially when you are actively radicalizing civilians daily

        • Cosmic Cleric
          link
          fedilink
          English
          31 year ago

          Sometimes u just can’t untie civilians and fighters,

          Then you figure out another way of getting to your enemy. There are rules to War.

          You don’t get a ‘get out of jail free card’ excuse to murder civilians.

          especially when you are actively radicalizing civilians daily

          Bombing them in refugee camps will do the same thing. That is, if they survive the bombing.

          • thecookingsenpai
            link
            fedilink
            English
            31 year ago

            Wait maybe I am expressing myself wrong, I agree with you 100% and all the words i was writing were to confirm your pov :)

            • Cosmic Cleric
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11 year ago

              Wait maybe I am expressing myself wrong, I agree with you 100% and all the words i was writing were to confirm your pov :)

              Astroturfers will use debating tactics like seeming to be positive about a point while actually wording it so that it comes off as slightly negative, etc., especially so if they’re expecting a lot of pushback.

              I wasn’t sure if you were doing that or not, but the ‘attitude’ of my reply was based on your original comment…

              A lot of comments are saying that hamas hides behind civilians but from what I see and read hamas and civilians are a melting pot that is interwined due to the extreme oppression in gaza strip. Any palestinian civilian could understand and help or even just not condemn totally hamas due to their conditions and prolly Israel gladly label as hamas any slightly suspect palestinian top

              In your original comment you didn’t specify your own opinion of why that was right/wrong, you just stated it as fact, and left us to assume either way.

              So my suggestion would be next time to elaborate more with a second paragraph, either agreeing or disagreeing with what you stated in the first paragraph.

              • @Bayz0r@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                21 year ago

                In their defense, it was pretty clear to me what they meant from the get-go and your replies seemed unnecessarily hostile.

                • Cosmic Cleric
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  01 year ago

                  In their defense, it was pretty clear to me what they meant from the get-go and your replies seemed unnecessarily hostile.

                  I truly don’t think I was being unnecessarily hostile, as I did assume they were astroturfing in a stealthy sort of way (as I described). For that matter, the fact that you’re defending them makes me suspect that you too are astroturfing to protect them.

                  The onus is on the speaker/commentor to speak fully, if they want to be understood fully, so that assumptions are not made, and misunderstanding do not happen. Trust me, I learned about that recently myself here on Lemmy lol.

                  I stand by what I said.

    • Phoenixz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      51 year ago

      Though You’re mostly right, it’s missing a key part: the Israeli government has actively worked to make it this way, sponsoring Hamas with money and help because they wanted this. If you have an extremist organization so intertwined in the civil population, you can just go and murder them all.

      Hamas is evil, but the Israeli government is arguably worse

  • Cosmic Cleric
    link
    fedilink
    English
    6
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    An army should go around civilians to get to their enemy, not through them.

  • Resol van Lemmy
    link
    fedilink
    English
    31 year ago

    The only world record you do not want to achieve without looking like a complete monster. And yet Israel managed to do just that.

    • @sailingbythelee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      51 year ago

      That is not even close to the world record. Killing 250 people in a day isn’t good, obviously, but it is not even a rounding error compared to real warfare.

      Just considering conventional weapons, the firebombing of Tokyo on the night of 9–10 March, 1945 killed approximately 100,000 people.

      • Resol van Lemmy
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        I’m just glad we didn’t reach numbers this insane. But still, it should be zero.

        • @sailingbythelee@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          I’m pretty sure this is a war. At least I’ve heard Israeli officials describe the current conflict as a war on Hamas. I don’t know of any war in which civilians aren’t negatively affected.

          Israel can’t really stop fighting Hamas yet. According to the BBC, Hamas is still receiving new weapons via their tunnel system. They apparently also have an extensive weapons manufacturing system within Gaza itself.

  • @Colour_me_triggered@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    11 year ago

    “with Palestinian authorities reporting that 250 people have been killed”

    Palestinian authorities (at least in Gaza) = Hamas. But I’m sure they have no reason to lie.

  • Venia Silente
    link
    fedilink
    English
    01 year ago

    Only 250 Palestinians in 24 hours? ngl, that sounds like rookie numbers for Israel.

    Come on guys, the Holocaust was proof that one can do better! Don’t aim to just be equal to the nazis, Israel; aim to surpass them!