• Che Banana
    link
    fedilink
    English
    572 years ago

    You mean, the country that still has Lords, Ladies, Barons, Dukes, Dutchesses and a Royal Family are… financially classist ???

    • @nogooduser@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      22 years ago

      I don’t think that that is related really. They are effectively just rich people who pass on generational wealth.

      It’s probably more to do with more than a decade of conservative government.

      I don’t think that anyone would argue that the US isn’t financially classist.

      • DessertStorms
        link
        fedilink
        22 years ago

        Lmfao, who do you think runs the government? (Hint: go read up on what some of those titles actually mean)

        • @nogooduser@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          32 years ago

          I’m not saying that they don’t have influence but the titles are pretty meaningless compared to the generational wealth.

          Again, the US has the same situation and they don’t have titles.

  • @agent_flounder@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    172 years ago

    I suppose next the UK is gonna axe the public healthcare system? Between inequality and the rising authoritarian laws showing up…yikes?

    • @tankplanker@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      152 years ago

      There is a few steps before then. We are currently at the stage of privatising previously state ran services within the NHS such as radiology and buying extra capacity from private business This is being done at a local level using existing budgets so it means money for actual services gets reduced or quality of service drops as no outsourcer works at a loss for very long.

      Other step that happens is you can pay to jump the queue by paying the heavily subsidised private offerings in the UK. This is often the same person you would have seen via the NHS. There isnt this huge magical pool of extra doctors in the UK who only work private (outside cosmetic) so anybody you see privately will almost certainly have a NHS case load. More work private, less work NHS as there is only so many hours they can and will work.

      Next stage is national privatisation of some of the bigger services, for example the recent agreement with Palantir that sells off our data for far less than its worth and without explicit patient permission.

      I would imagine as that will increase costs it will then become optional to pay for the NHS and instead you can pay for private cover (rather than paying for both as we do currently if you want private cover). Once this happens its only a matter of time before the NHS becomes an empty shell as the middle earners who pay the most tax towards the NHS will simply stop paying. Then at that point does private start getting way more expensive and the exclusions start.

      Usually some privatisation apologist will appear and say that we do not have to follow the American model, to which I always say what exactly about this government has ever given you the complete confidence that anything other than the shitest option will happen. Its nice to wish for unicorns but they are not going to happen here.

    • @aDuckk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      62 years ago

      Look at how many cheap screens and toys the slaves have made for us, luxuries our forebears with nutritious food and community resources and homes could never imagine

  • Cosmicomical
    link
    fedilink
    42 years ago

    The best thing is that ghis means Europe is just spending less, but it’s doing the same thing. Wtf EU

  • Cyborganism
    link
    fedilink
    English
    32 years ago

    Capitalism, even though it was invented by the Dutch, I always associated with Anglo-Saxon Protestant culture.

    You can see these same problems being repeated in other Anglo-Saxon countries like Canada, the U.S. and Australia, but less so in countries with other cultural influences.

  • @amenotef@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Generally companies get lower tax rate than physical persons with 10+ years experience in many european countries. And the rich have all assets in their companies. In my opinion it should be lowered to match the same as the companies. As for the lower class that can barely afford stuff with a basic salary in some EU countries, stay very low or just null.