“The term natural gas does not explicitly convey the fossil origins of such gas, leading to potential misunderstandings and hampering policy-making,”

  • roguetrick
    link
    fedilink
    132 years ago

    Do folks think we’re bottling cow farts? Wood gas is about the only non fossil gas we use (though sewer gas lamps still exist I think.)

    • @kakes@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      232 years ago

      From the article:

      “They would really resist. They just started saying the most amazing things back to me, like, ‘But it’s natural,’ or ‘It’s green, it’s good,’” he said.

      I generally try not to talk down to people, but jesus christ how ignorant can these people possibly be? Do they think just because it isn’t literally coal that it’s somehow beneficial? Who educated them? Absolutely wild.

      • roguetrick
        link
        fedilink
        21
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        It’s funny to me, because when it was coined, natural gas made SENSE. See town gas, the majority of gas used in cities, was made at gas plants from coal or wood and piped to homes as a clean burning fuel. You’d have gas plants that created the gas. Natural gas, therefore, was just gas that was natural and not made vs the syngas that most people had used. It wasn’t some sort of nefarious marketing ploy, it was just an apt description of where the gas came from.

        Edit: and to clarify, natural gas was a whole hell of a lot safer than town gas. The ole head in the oven suicide trope was based on town gas having a high percentage of carbon monoxide.

        • @bitwaba@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          22 years ago

          The ole head in the oven suicide trope was based on town gas having a high percentage of carbon monoxide.

          The gas didn’t have carbon monoxide. The gas released carbon monoxide as a byproduct when the gas was combusted to release the heat for the oven.

      • MelodiousFunk
        link
        fedilink
        132 years ago

        Who educated them?

        I think the most common answer for this topic would be, “No one, really.” Except maybe energy marketing/ads. You know, the folks that brought us “clean coal” and “fracking is totally safe and will definitely not bork your groundwater.”

      • WashedOver
        link
        fedilink
        82 years ago

        Not being familiar with all things oil and gas would be pretty common for people not living in areas where it is processed or compressed. It’s much like a Linux enthusiast being upset at Windows and Mac users not realizing there are other OSs for computers. Might not be in their realm of thought.

        Natural has been a wonderfully misleading marketing term for food products too. There’s no regulations in the US on what one calls “natural” ingredients. Most people mistake it for being like organic just as intended. Natural just sounds good. Unfortunately radioactive material can be natural too.

        • @kakes@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          42 years ago

          You got me there, I am indeed from Alberta, Canada. Do people really not have any idea where the fuel they use every day comes from? Maybe I’m just more curious than others, I guess.

          To be clear, I don’t disagree with changing the term to something less misleading. Just surprised is all.

  • @masquenox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    31 year ago

    It’s a good idea. Words are extremely powerful - by dictating what something is called, you can frame a given narrative as this or that before any education on said narrative has even occured. People think it’s nitpicky, but it’s not - they pay propagandists a lot of money to come up with words.

  • XbSuper
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -72 years ago

    Does he think it will somehow get me to turn my furnace off? Because I won’t.

    • @NarrativeBear@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      6
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Theres no reason to think this would be the case. The hopes is to change the terminology so the conversation can start to happen and policy making can be more effective. I’m certain most politicians for example fall into the same fallacy thinking “natural” means “good”.

      There are also many alternatives to whole home heating. But they are not widely adopted by builders as policy does not require it. Examples include:

      Radiant Underfloor Heating, Solar Thermal, Heat Pumps, Wood Stoves, Space Heaters

      Most of these don’t require a “subscription model” for purchasing fule, if combined with on-site solar, wind, or geothermal.

    • @vector_zero@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      22 years ago

      I’m with you, but language has a scary amount of influence over how people perceive the world around them.

      It’s going to be a sad day when I have to replace my gas oven and stove with electric appliances. There’s something deeply ingrained in humans that draws us to fire.

      • roofuskit
        link
        fedilink
        32 years ago

        A good induction top with the right cookware can be as good or better than a good gas cooktop.

      • I won’t give it up. Not until I know for a fact that there will never be a power outage. The grid is getting worse and we are supposed to become more dependent on it? Hell no.

        • Spzi
          link
          fedilink
          English
          22 years ago

          You can install your own panels and turbines and storage, or do it together with some neighbors or the city.

          Independence is possible with renewables, but not so with fossil fuels.

          • @afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            -22 years ago

            My goal is not independence my goal is being able to deal with likely situations. Also you seem to think I am some guy with a house and land I own in the middle of nowhere. Did you ask if I rent? Did you ask if my house is a double?

            • Spzi
              link
              fedilink
              English
              22 years ago

              If you are not in charge, replace the “You” with whoever is in charge. When you said “I won’t give it up” it seemed you had some control.

              • @afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                -22 years ago

                You in this case is my scumbag landlord who inherited 17 houses and hasn’t worked a day in his life.

                Yes I do have a degree of control. I could replace my stove which would mean that next blackout I won’t be able to cook. Control isn’t binary I have a degree of it. On top of that I doubt my scumbag landlord would be able to get solar anyhow. It isn’t like some zoning board Karen wouldn’t be able to reject it because it doesn’t fit neighborhood character