• @kn33@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    192 years ago

    I’m comfortable in my weight. However, my girlfriend is not. We won’t be flying any airline that weighs us. That would be a small crisis for her.

    • @Kekzkrieger@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      112 years ago

      You have your whole luaggage scanned, body scans, fingerprints, passport and even custom officers asking you where you stay and god knows what background checks are going on, but weight is gonna be an issue ?

      • @kn33@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        62 years ago

        Where she is right now mentally, it’s best for her to not have a number put to what she weighs.

        • @Kekzkrieger@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          62 years ago

          Fair, it doesnt change the reality tho, its just a number whatever that number may look like.

          I dont agree with that proposed practice either, in fact i would be more happy if we wouldnt have to go through most of the “safety” procedures they put in place, but its not going to change my choice of airlines because i book whatever is convinient and affordable.

  • Otter
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    122 years ago

    On September 16, it became evident that airlines were becoming more interested in passengers’ weight. Prominent carriers like Korean Air and Air New Zealand introduced a rather unconventional rule, requiring passengers to step on scales before boarding their flights. […] This novel approach in the aviation industry has gained momentum, with the objective of maintaining optimal aircraft weight and thereby reducing fuel consumption. The primary goal of this unconventional procedure is to precisely determine the standard weight of passengers and averages. This, in turn, aids in accurately calculating the distribution of weight on the aircraft, resulting in fuel savings. […] The ultimate objective is to ensure that each flight adheres to strict parameters set by the maximum take-off weight of the aircraft, thereby enhancing safety. However, for many, this emphasis on safety might feel like an intrusion into their privacy.

    I didn’t know that this was a factor that they needed to consider. The privacy aspect is real, and we need regulations on storage and deletion of this data after each flight. I can already see this info being sold to advertisers.

    On the discomfort side, couldn’t they have the collection and recording happen in the background? If no other passengers or staff can see the numbers, there’s less of a chance of someone feeling uncomfortable with the process.

    This is all assuming that this is actually necessary or helpful.

    • ParkingPsychology
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      42 years ago

      On the discomfort side, couldn’t they have the collection and recording happen in the background? If no other passengers or staff can see the numbers, there’s less of a chance of someone feeling uncomfortable with the process.

      The weighing process involves humans, so that wouldn’t be possible.

      Their average intelligence being what it is, when instructed to have one person on the scale, sometimes it’s one, sometimes two, sometimes two and a stroller. Sometimes somehow a horse ends up on the scale and no one really understands how, including that horse.

      Unless you check the weight, you don’t know what exactly was weighed.

      • @Womble@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 years ago

        i mean, if theres a plate on the floor and soneone checks theres only one person on it before a button is pressed that solves that and theres no reason to display the number. Flash up an error to retry if its more than 3 sigma away from the expected mean.

  • Pisodeuorrior
    link
    fedilink
    92 years ago

    It’s a slippery slope. Soon they’ll have two separate queues, and one of them will be called “fatties”.

  • @Fedizen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    72 years ago

    I mean they do need to balance the plane so it makes sense, another thing they could do is eliminate first class seats and spread the seating out a little more so they can relocate passengers easier.

  • @Squids@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    52 years ago

    This doesn’t sound like they’re charging extra if you’re over a certain weight, which is what a lot of people here seem to be assuming. Its data collection for future designs.

    People are aware that you get charged for overweight baggage for health and safety reasons, right? Anything over about 20 kilos is too heavy for a single person to safely handle so they have to get two people to do it, which costs more time and money. I would be very genuinely surprised if a few dozen more kilos from overweight baggage and people would be enough to seriously impact a plane’s flight unless you’re on a small town hopper

  • girl4life2023
    link
    fedilink
    32 years ago

    I’m not ok with it but I think airlines should make bigger seats available. make it an option to book these chairs , no weighting needed, but I rather pay for a bigger seat than book 2 seats and the 2 seats not honoured when boarding the plane.