Our research was technically right, but we had not taken into account changes in human behavior. Cars are more convenient and comfortable than walking, buses and subways — and that is why they are so popular. Make them even cheaper through ride-sharing and people are coaxed away from those other forms of transit.

This dynamic became clear in the data a few years later: On average, ride-hailing trips generated far more traffic and 69% more carbon dioxide than the trips they displaced.

We were proud of our contribution to ride-sharing but dismayed to see the results of a 2018 study that found that Uber Pool was so cheap it increased overall city travel: For every mile of personal driving it removed, it added 2.6 miles of people who otherwise would have taken another mode of transportation.

  • @Kuinox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    152 years ago

    Where I live, Uber solved the getting home drunk problem.
    Public transport isn’t open at night.

    • @RageAgainstTheSurge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      72 years ago

      Public transit has been lacking in my city even before the pandemic. They are still paying off for a light rail system from a decade ago that they are not maintaining. Also all the ticket machines smell like piss, which should not be a surprised considering for years there’s been some guy who has been urinating at almost all the station.

  • BarqsHasBite
    link
    fedilink
    English
    82 years ago

    Of course Uber wouldn’t help traffic.

    Robotaxis? Probably not. But autonomous vehicles that can communicate and drive as a group? Yes that will help. Then induced demand and all that, but it will increase capacity.

    • @Tvkan@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      72 years ago

      We’ve seen time and time again that increased capacity doesn’t actually help traffic.

      Capacity just isn’t the issue.

    • Flying SquidOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      22 years ago

      Robust public transportation will help a lot more. But go ahead and argue with the MIT scientists who wrote this article if you like. Their research seems to show you’re wrong.