• @RagingNerdoholic@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    172 years ago

    As Mozilla points out, there are numerous safe browsing systems to which you can opt in — opting in being the key here — and there’s nothing preventing any entity, the French government included, from creating their own software, browser extension, or DNS service for anti-fraud purposes. They don’t need legislation for that, but they do need laws to force software providers to implement a non-optional, government-operated blacklist of “no-no” sites they deem unacceptable for any reason they see fit; it will absolutely not be limited to fraud alone.

    France’s proposal is so stupefyingly contrived, it’s so obvious this is the true intention.

    • @bouh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      82 years ago

      What’s even more evil is that we already have dns filtering for isp. Somehow, by making this new law they are acknowledging the old one was stupidly ineffective.

  • denny
    link
    fedilink
    English
    42 years ago

    Edge got a shitstorm for in-browser self ads on the chrome page, now in-browser censoring? The internet bows down to EU, sure, but one nosy country? If at all the official download links for France would be laced, but not anywhere else i.e. its gonna be yet another joykiller for normies, like… even the thought of maintainers pushing another release specificially for a country is laughable. That’s my assessment anyways. Signed

  • @ramble81@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    32 years ago

    So what about things like cURL, wget, Invoke-Webrequest, straight up nc calls. Where does the line exist?

    • @ISOmorph@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12 years ago

      It’s not about making it impossible to reach certain sites. It’s about making it harder for normies. Take a guess if your neighbor knows about wget.

      • @Opafi@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 years ago

        No, it’s not. It’s just not. The important question is how the law is written. Wild guess: they won’t target “browsers”. They’ll target “means to display remote content” or some shit to not have people rename browsers to surfers to evade that law. And depending on how generic they’ll make it sound, it’ll be a pain for not only every piece of software but maybe also stuff like digital binoculars or phone sex companies or whatever.

  • Veraxus
    link
    fedilink
    22 years ago

    When did France’s government get taken over by US Republicans?

        • nicetriangle
          link
          fedilink
          22 years ago

          Yeah amazing how the next asshole can re-contextualize the previous asshole. George W Bush looks practically humanitarian now in comparison to Trump, for example.