• @De_Narm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    441 year ago

    It’s true, there is the added danger of being run over by a car. A lot of them actively hate seeing you on the same street.

  • @RustyNova@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    221 year ago

    What? They are right. But that doesn’t mean it’s a pro car argument. Cars are definitely safer as bicycles can’t utter wrecks you like they do to bicycles

    • @MonkRome@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      41 year ago

      From what I recall it really depends on how you classify danger. Bikes are more dangerous for non-lethal injuries. But any car trip that you drive over 45 mph is slightly more lethal than biking per comparable trip. So it depends on what danger you’re willing to risk.

        • @MonkRome@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          By comparable, I mean from point a to point b. If you have a 10 mile commute to work, you have a slightly higher lethality driving a car on a highway, than biking to work, but you have a higher chance of non-lethal injury by biking.

            • @MonkRome@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              1
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Maybe comparable was the wrong word but I think think your using that to intentionally miss my point. When assessing the risk of a commute, if you are looking at per mile risk, biking is less lethal but more injury prone.

  • @Phegan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    191 year ago

    I mean, it’s more dangerous for someone on a bike or Scooter on car-centric infrastructure than it is for someone in a car.

    • Jerkface (any/all)
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 year ago

      Only if you consider only the safety of the vehicle’s pilot. Another perhaps more rational way to look at it is to look at how it affects the safety of all people. And then it’s clear that the car is still more dangerous than the bike, even on infrastructure specifically designed for car safety above all else.

  • @werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    11 year ago

    Riding a Grizzly bear is right up there with hot air ballooning? Wow! How about riding a grizzly while eating a raw meat sandwich and having a large cut on your leg?

  • @LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -41 year ago

    This is why we need to segregate cars off the road away from bikes, and then keep shrinking the car lanes by just a few cm each year, until some cars just can’t fit, and gaslight the car users that cars must just be getting bigger, until eventually even London black cabs and old mini coopers couldn’t fit through, while bicycle lanes keep getting more and more lanes, and the fence between the two starts having barbed wire and more and more CCTV all facing the car users, as the cameras whirr in on faces of the users aggressively, disrupting the silence of sitting in traffic, eventually we install displays inward to the car lanes that show ads, but conspicuously only of bikes, skates and longboards…

    • @MalReynolds@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 year ago

      So, the opposite of what’s been happening with embiggening cars and unchanging roads in many places. Often designed so that cars could park on either side and still use the road two-way, they’re now effectively one-way due to wider cars, but dickheads think they can fit, and bad things happen. I like it, turnaround is fair play. Good luck making it happen.