I can’t sleep anymore reading this stuff. The only chance that this can ever be regulated out of existence is through far reaching federal legislation that reinforces the 4th amendment in the digital age. And we know there is zero chance of that.
The public space has never included a true right to privacy but the raw intake and storage and analysis of your every biometric and existence to create a profile on every figure regardless of threat or action in society is a fucking Invasion of being.
The whole point is to change the risk calculations people make in order to make “civil” and “polite” actions such as protests, legislation, etc. more risky and therefore most people are less likely to engage in.
What these dumb asses don’t realize is that if the level of risk for the “peaceful” options rises to the same level as alternatives, which are arguably much more effective, then those are going to be the only recourse people have and the actions people will take.
I do believe your analysis is correct about there being zero chance of it being legislated away. So now what?
The answer is the alternatives or get crushes under the boot heel.
relying on an unjust law system and corrupt politicians is a no starter. the only way is for the general public to stop consenting to it.
they sell us hard on nothing to fear/nothing to hide rhetoric for a reason.
Me: I don’t consent to invasion of my being.
General public: k.
E: Shareholders: Jack Nicholson nodding yes menacingly
even worse: I brought up flock cameras to an aquaintance and their response was essentially “why is that so bad, they already have all our data from our phones, what’s one more set of cameras”
I swear to fuck. It’s like talking to brick walls. You have the freedom to control your phone.
Brick city
Amazon is sharing the books we’ve been reading/buying with the fascists in charge? I guess I’m on all the lists now for sure. 🫠
Surveillance cams next year (autonomous with Grok AI)
where is this from?
Until now a military drone, but maybe in the near future also for civil surveillance and use in the US
do you have the source of this picture?
“Benefiting private economic interests is absolutely one of the leading factors in creating these groups and organizations, and the public is all too happy to carry water for it,”
This sums up any of these private-public partnerships… Asset protection against primarily petty crime (while “shielding” behind terrorism), and increased camera-coverage at no cost to the taxpayer (to more efficiently treat symptoms, instead of recognizing problem causes: as to maintain the dysfunctional system, which disproportionately benefits a few). Respect to Albury for having a functional moral compass.
What the fuck are Amazon and Facebook doing? They were always spying on everyone, but that was just for targeted ads.
Now that the government is on the brink of flat out fascism they start sharing their data?
It is not targeted ads, they generate behaviour profiles to manage people’s behaviour into complying with corporate interests. It was all fun and games until the UK brexited and DJT became POTUS
Never was only for targeted ads, because of the lack of a privacy right policy in the US, your data is open for everyone, also for gov and security agencies. All your data in these services are owned by these. Even when you cancel your account, your data remain there forever.
So, here’s the crux of the problem.
The internet as it is now and as it has existed for the vast majority of its life is an ad supported system.
The ad money is drying up because of several things:
AI is taking away click throughs to websites meaning they don’t get ad click throughs or impressions. They run ads to keep the lights on and they are being starved of the engagement that ads pay for.
People have less spending power than they have ever had. Ads don’t mean anything if people can’t afford products.
There is a pivot to trying to get rich people to buy goods and services but even though they have most of the wealth they don’t need most goods and services. This means the best way to get them to spend money is to have them invest to grow that money.
Ad companies require people to buy the goods and services that they are advertising in order to continue to pay for ads and ad aggregation.
A large subset of the populace really does hate ads and also wants things for free. They do not want to be told that nothing is free and ads are how a lot of the internet makes money.
The alternative to ad supported internet is data supported internet but people really really hate data brokers and data brokers mainly sell or offer up the use of data to three groups. Other data brokers/ad aggregators, the government/military industrial complex, and criminals.
So naturally companies that used to sustain themselves on ad aggregation now do so by pursuing government contracts. Because the line must go up.
Also the amount of bots (including, to a limited amount, private openclaw bots browsing the web) means that ads served are not really delivered to many humans (and said bots are really getting good at bypassing traditional captchas) & that destroys the value proposition of ads. That’s why Meta lobbies so hard for age verification – they want to be able to distinguish humans from bots, as they used to be able to
From their POV: imagine if it was illegal for you to not buy their shit? They would love that and try to help it however they can
I’m assuming so does Elon and his tech bro minions as well. We need way more South African immigrants until we reach the tipping point then BOOM!..conquered. /s
