• @Vent@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      502 months ago

      You can easily do a same-day wire transfer of this amount. Technically there’s no limit on the size of wire transfers. There’s probably a point where the bank will start asking questions, but car / mortgage down-payment sized transfers aren’t an issue.

      But, yeah, I bet cash withdrawals are another ballgame. Not least because the bank probably doesn’t actually keep that much cash in typical customer-facing locations.

    • @Katana314@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      152 months ago

      Is there not a security concern of doing basic checks before handing out cash?

      For instance, elderly woman gets a text message telling her the IRS needs $50k cash or they’ll take her house. The bank says they need a few days, she complains that the IRS wants it now…and then they help explain that it’s likely a scam.

      • @Serinus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        22 months ago

        Yes, typically. I don’t know if that trumps “the bank has to give you your money when you ask for your money.”

  • @WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    222 months ago

    Hmm, are you still covered by the FDIC if you deliberately engineer a bank failure? Let’s say all of Bank of America’s customers decided that they just really wanted to fuck BoA hard. So they arrange to all demand the complete liquidations of their accounts, all at once. Or maybe people arrange a series of bank failures as part of some broader political movement. But hypothetically, if a group of people deliberately caused their bank to fail, would their deposits still be FDIC-insured? In other words, if you deliberately arrange a bank run, will you still be covered by FDIC insurance?

    • @bestagon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      162 months ago

      It exists to cover bank runs and it is your money. There is nothing wrong with wanting your money in any given moment. That’s just my take though, I’m not a lawyer.

      I think it’d basically defeat its preventative purpose though if a story got out that people weren’t covered, even in an engineered bank run. What if you’re not in on the plot? What if it happens tomorrow at your bank? Are you just fucked too? Better withdraw all your money to be safe

      • @WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        62 months ago

        What a potentially powerful tool of protest. Imagine if you got a movement of a few million people. They all move to a target bank. A few months later, they all demand their full account liquidation. Then you move on to the next megabank. One by one, drop them like flies.

        • @KinglyWeevil@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          12 months ago

          With a few million people it doesn’t even need to be a specific bank. It would cause an enormous problem. Especially since we’re used to assets being digital these days. Request enough actual physical cash and it would rapidly reach a breaking point.

    • @DannyBoy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      7
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      It’d be hard to prove a single participant. An organizer, maybe? But if you just heard everybody’s doing a bank run on the 20th and you’re scared of the stability of your bank, so you decide to withdraw your money on the 19th so you can put it into another bank, that seems reasonable.

      (i know nothing about digital transfers between banks)

    • @Aneb@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      02 months ago

      Hi, I don’t think my withdrawal of $20 from my collective accounts with BOA would really cause a failure… but I’m willing to try! Sincerely, -Poor

      PS there are no ethical millionaires

  • @saltesc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    172 months ago

    I struggle to understand what modern insurance companies actually exist for, apart from money people donating money to them for nothing in return.

    • @bleistift2@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      192 months ago

      Insurance prevents people from hoarding money that they would need in case of a (personal) disaster to rebuild/repair/re-purchase their losses. If you know insurance will cover your house if it ever burns down, you spend the money, which helps the economy.

      • @LaLuzDelSol@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        112 months ago

        Huh? Most people don’t have enough cash to pay off their home, let alone save up enough to be able to buy a backup home. That’s what insurance is for- it protects you from expenses that would be ruinous if you had to pay them out of pocket. The insurance company takes in more than it pays out, but it’s worth it for home insurance (and health insurance in the good old US of A). It’s why buying insurance on some $100 tech thing is always a ripoff.