• Helix 🧬
    link
    fedilink
    92 years ago

    Cute? Try actually using them. I have nightmares.

    Also, they didn’t include the paperclip emoji which is a dealbreaker for me.

      • @imgprojts@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        32 years ago

        📎 this is Paper Clip, Clippy’s useless cousin. He holds paper if you put it in it’s butt. It’s the only thing it does and it doesn’t do it well.

        • Helix 🧬
          link
          fedilink
          5
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          I thought Clippy was the useless cousin? Paperclips are more helpful in an office environment than Clippy in my experience…

          Fun fact: in Germany, Clippy’s name is Karl Klammer.

          Another fun fact: Clippy’s real name is Clippit.

      • Helix 🧬
        link
        fedilink
        32 years ago

        I know. It’s even mentioned in the article. They should’ve still designed a non copyrighted version.

  • Amicese
    link
    fedilink
    42 years ago

    …to get people to develop another dependency on Microsoft.

      • Amicese
        link
        fedilink
        42 years ago

        By getting people to use architecture that Microsoft owns. It’s what they’re doing with GitHub right now.

        • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆
          link
          fedilink
          32 years ago

          Please explain what this has to do with the architecture Microsoft owns. The icons are licensed as MIT, anybody can clone them to whatever git hosting service they want.

          • Amicese
            link
            fedilink
            -12 years ago

            Microsoft could change their license when enough people rely on their emoji design. It’s what they do to GitHub.

                • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆
                  link
                  fedilink
                  42 years ago

                  Licenses would be completely useless if you could just change them retroactively. Whatever was released under MIT will be available under MIT in perpetuity. MS can release this under a different license later or add new things using a different license, but it can’t retroactively revoke MIT license from the content that was already released under it.

      • @Zerush@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        1
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        I don’t know, in Windows you can Pop Up these with Winkey+. to insert them anywhere 🤔

        • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆
          link
          fedilink
          12 years ago

          well that is a convenient way to add emojis, a rare case of windows doing something right :P

          they are just regular emojis though, and get rendered by whatever the emoji system set is being used

          • @Zerush@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            12 years ago

            There are several things that Windows does well, if it weren’t for the spyware and all the junk that comes by default and that is hard to remove, it would be an excellent OS.

            • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆
              link
              fedilink
              22 years ago

              I personally dislike the UX on Windows. It feels very hodgepodge to me. The spyware and junk is the big issue though. This is why I don’t really like getting invested in any proprietary solutions. No matter how good a piece of software is initially, sooner or later the company will take it in a direction you don’t like because in order to stay profitable they have to chase the mainstream users. As soon as you fall out of that group, the product starts diverging from your needs.

              On the other hand, this problem is less of an issue in open source. If the developers take a project in a new direction then it can always be forked as long there are enough people interested in preserving the existing functionality. One of my favorite examples of this is GNOME where it ended up being forked in to Mate and Cinnamon after the big UX direction switch.

              • @Zerush@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                12 years ago

                I agree with this, although Windows has many technical advantages. I’m not so much against soft proprietary, but I am against big tech monopolies such as Microsoft, which dominates practically the entire software market. On the other hand, I always hear that Windows is the easiest OS to handle, easier than Linux, which is only true at first glance. Windows allows a huge number of configurations with more than 200 configurable points, but intentionally very hidden and poorly documented, inaccessible to normal users without great computer knowledge, but that allow to turn it into a fast and private OS, eliminating all this garbage. MS tolerates it, because its main income is from its software, generally quite high prices and less from Windows as such, at least not until now. The thing will probably change with Windows 11 in the near future, where the company intends to limit access to third-party software, it is more by appropriating the entire system, avoiding or hindering the installation of another Operating System, rather than under the Windows layer. This is why I think that Windows 10 is going to be the last Windows for somewhat more thoughtful users. In stores here you can see more and more that they sell PCs without OS (with FreeDOS), leaving it to the user’s choice.

                • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆
                  link
                  fedilink
                  12 years ago

                  Proprietary software should be treated as being fungible. It can be useful, but I don’t want to end up being locked into into having to use it. That means that I don’t want to use it for any situations where it would be difficult to replace or where I wouldn’t be able to easily extract my data from it.

      • @federico3@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        12 years ago

        First you release something, wait until is widely adopted and then add ways to control users or capture their data, for example host contents on a CDN you control, or add paid extras, or switch license for later releases. All of this examples happened in the past. The good old embrace-extend-lock-in.

      • @imgprojts@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        12 years ago

        Probably something insidious. Something totally shitty evil barely legal that their lawyers worked on for a good 200 man years over a period of 3 months.

  • Sr Estegosaurio
    link
    fedilink
    12 years ago

    Now I need to figure out how to use them on linux… I may hate M$ but I like the emojis.